DEFINITION OF SEVENTH-DAY BAPTIST
Those who hold to the Seventh-day Baptist religious view, are a sect which incorporate
Sabbatarian beliefs into their doctrinal position. There are many Sabbatarian religious groups
and individual churches, including the Seventh-day Adventists who also came out of the baptist
religious background of William Miller and the Millerite movement of the early to middle
1840's. Sabbatarian beliefs have followed the Christian church since its inception.
The Sabbatarian view is that the seventh day of the week, Saturday, is the Sabbath and is the
only properly ordained day by God on which the church can worship. They believe that
Christians who worship on Sunday are breaking the law of God and are sinful in their conduct.
Some extreme groups believe that those who fail to keep the seventh day Sabbath (Saturday) as
the day of worship, cannot obtain salvation.
Most Sabbatarian groups claim that the early church and the apostles did not worship on Sunday,
but on Saturday, and that the Pope changed the day of worship to Sunday. This particular claim
has absolutely no merit, but many try to marshall their historical evidence to prove the
point.
The Seventh-day Baptist General Conference of the United States and Canada does not maintain
a defined creed of belief and does not impose such on the individual churches that are members,
but, those churches develop their own creeds and doctrines. However, the General Conference
does make a requirement and has developed a creed to which all member churches must
subscribe, in relation to the seventh day and the Sabbath. Instead of uniting as an association to
proclaim the gospel or to declare the person and message of Jesus Christ, they base their rallying
cry and unity on adherence to the observance of the Sabbath. The primary issue, and the main
requirement of the General Conference, is that individual churches observe the Sabbath as the
day of worship. This is not only seen in the name of the General Conference, but is expressed in
the names of the individual churches. All are dedicated to the "Seventh-day" and that is the
significance of the organization and the identity of the individual churches that is presented as
setting them apart from other Christian churches.
VERSES USED TO SUPPORT POSITION
The Sabbatarian position is held because of an interpretive view of Scriptures that they use in
order
to support their belief. The main Scriptures used are as follows:
- Genesis 2:3 (NAS)
Then God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because in it He rested from all His work
which God had created and made.
- Exodus 20:8-11 (NAS)
"Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but
the seventh day is a Sabbath of the Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work, you or your
son or your daughter, your male or your female servant or your cattle or your sojourner who
stays with you. For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in
them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it
holy."
- Mark 2:27-28 (NAS)
Jesus said to them, "The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of
Man is Lord even of the Sabbath."
- Luke 4:16 (NAS)
Jesus kept the Sabbath.
And He came to Nazareth, where He had been brought up; and as was His custom, He entered
the
synagogue on the Sabbath, and stood up to read."
- Luke 23:56 (NAS)
The women observed the Sabbath before preparing the body of Jesus Christ.
Then they returned and prepared spices and perfumes. And on the Sabbath they rested according
to the commandment.
- Acts 18:4 (NAS)
Paul taught and reasoned on the Sabbath.
And he was reasoning in the synagogue every Sabbath and truing to persuade Jews and
Greeks.
- John 14:15 (NAS)
"If you love Me, you will keep My commandments."
- Galatians 5:1 (NAS)
It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject
again
to a yoke of slavery
OPPOSITION TO VERSES USED
- Genesis 2:3
Sabbatarians begin with Genesis, like many Reformed and Puritan theologians, in order to
support the theory that the Sabbath is a primary, moral, overriding and eternal command of God
that cannot be abrogated. Taking the Genesis reference, Sabbatarians begin to build their
doctrines on ASSUMPTIONS that they believe are contained in the reference. These
ASSUMPTIONS are:
A. God established a perpetual Sabbath day as the seventh day.
B. God established that Sabbath day as a day of worship.
C. The command applied to every human being, both then and in the future.
D. The command must be obeyed forever.
The biggest problem with the Sabbatarian interpretation of the Genesis reference is, that none of
the assumptions made are actually stated in the verse. The question then becomes, what does the
verse state that God established, in relation to what is ASSUMED that He established?
- (a) He blessed the seventh day. He looked on it with favor or granted favor to it.
- (b) He sanctified the seventh day. He set it apart from the other days in a manner, the
details of which, are not specified.
- (c) He did those things because it marked the end of His creation acts and represented, to
appearances, a time of rest in which to other creative acts were taking place.
God did three things in relation to the seventh day: (1) He blessed it, (2) He sanctified it, (3) He
rested on it.
All acts that God did were in relation to the day and to Himself. It was God who rested and it
was God who established, blessed and sanctified the day as a result of an act of rest which he
accomplished Himself. No place in the verse is the day applied to humanity in any manner nor is
there any command to humanity, either by implication or direct word, to observe or honor the day
in any manner. There is no indication or implication, within the verse, that God spoke to Adam
and Eve regarding the day or gave them any instructions regarding the day. Everything in the
verse indicates that the day was set aside by God, for Himself and for His good
pleasure.
The seventh-day was not given any special name. It was not was not noted as being The Sabbath
day, a Sabbath day, nor was it specified as being a memorial day, feast day, worship day,
sacrificial day or attached to an observance of any kind, in relation to humanity. It may not be
assumed or implied, by any wording in the text, that humanity was involved in any manner with
the seventh-day of Genesis 2:3. It is not even stated that God informed Adam and Eve as to what
He had done in relation to the day. No instructions are given by God, to Adam and Eve,
regarding conduct in relation to the day. No commands are given to them regarding observance
of the day and no teaching or doctrine is given in regards to the importance or obligations
attached to humanity regarding the day.
If this verse is considered to be the foundation of the Sabbath and the establishment of the
perpetual obligation of humanity to honor the institution, it is difficult to understand how that
teaching can be found by looking at the verse in an exegetical manner. Sabbatarians use the
verse in an eisegetical manner, reading into the verse what they wish to be there in order to
support the claim that they make regarding the validity of the purpose for which their
organizations and beliefs were established.
Sabbatarians begin with a false premise that ultimately leads to a false conclusion. Seventh-day
keepers begin with the ASSUMPTION that THE Sabbath was established in Genesis 2:3, and it
is
a moral and permanent obligation of all people, in perpetuity, including Christians today.
Therefore they worship of Saturday, considering that to be the only valid worship day approved
by God.
Other Sabbatarian based beliefs, including the Reformed belief and many puritans, also begin
with a false premise that ultimately leads to a false conclusion. They also begin with the
ASSUMPTION that The Sabbath was established in Genesis 2 and is a moral and permanent
obligation of all people, in perpetuity, including Christians today. Beginning with an
ASSUMPTION, they also end with another ASSUMPTION, stating that the seventh day Sabbath
was changed to the first day during the forty days after the resurrection of Jesus Christ, either by
the authority of the apostles or by Jesus Christ Himself. Unfortunately, the conclusion is also
false, because the teaching is not found in the Scripture. Regardless of the destination desired, a
false premise will eventually lead to a false conclusion.
- Exodus 20:8-11
In this verse, Sabbatarians see the confirmation of their claim that Genesis 2:3 was the
establishment of The Sabbath. But an examination of the verses show that the view is flawed
and again based on ASSUMPTIONS not stated in the Scripture.
- The first note is made in reference to the word "remember" at the start of verse
eight. Sabbatarians claim that if the Israelites were to "remember" the Sabbath, then it
must have been instituted prior to Exodus chapter 8 in order for them to recall. They then make
an ASSUMPTION that the reference to the Sabbath is a reference to Genesis 2:3, and to
"remember" is to recall that event. In the first claim, the Sabbatarians are correct in that
there was a Sabbath for them to "remember" that was holy to the Lord. In the second
assumption they are wrong, in that the Sabbath that they were to "remember" was not the
event of Genesis 3:2, but the event of Exodus 16:23 in which they were to collect enough manna
to bake and cook for two days on sixth day, and then celebrate the seventh day as the Sabbath. It
was to be a day of rest. Exodus 16:23 is the first mention of a Sabbath in the Scripture, and is
directly related to Israel and the events regarding the 10 commandments of Exodus 20 that
follow. The Lord's command to "remember" was especially critical, in that many refused
to obey they instructions that they were given by Him in Exodus 16, and had been frequently
"forgetful" in their relationship to God and the recollection of the miraculous ways in which He
had preserved them in their exodus from Egypt.
- Secondly, the reference to Genesis 2:3 in the Exodus 20:8-11 verses are used to affirm the
connection with Genesis 2:3 as the establishment of the Sabbath. However, that is not the
purpose of the connection. They are commanded to remember the Sabbath, established in
chapter 16, and it is to be honored according to the pattern established by God in Genesis 2:3.
Just as God worked six days and rested on the seventh, they are commanded to work six days a
rest on the seventh. The Sabbath is given to them, as a representation of the rest that God gives,
that not only was seen in the physical provision of food through the manna, but through the
spiritual commandments of God that lead to a realization of sin and the call to God for rest in
forgiveness.
The explanation given in regards to Genesis 2:3 and Exodus 20:8-11 is significant. It is stated
that God rested on the seventh day, and he blessed the Sabbath. They are two separate events,
connected to each other only in type, but not in kind. The seventh day was blessed by God in
Genesis 2:3, but it was not the Sabbath. The Sabbath was blessed in Exodus 20:8-11 and was
established on the seventh day. The seventh day was God's personal day, established in Genesis
2:3. He then established the Sabbath on the seventh day and gave it to his people, a gift of His
day of rest. The difficulty for the Sabbatarian is quite clear. If they believe that the seventh-day,
in Genesis 2:3, which was blessed and sanctified by God, represented the establishment of the
Sabbath as a perpetual obligation, why did God again bless and make holy, or consecrate, the
Sabbath day (Genesis 20:11) which was established in Genesis 20:8-11? Since, according to
Sabbatarians the Sabbath was established, blessed and sanctified in Genesis 2:3, there would
have been no necessity or reason to bless, sanctify and make holy the Sabbath in Genesis
20.
- Thirdly, the reference to Exodus 20:8-11 is used as a justification for the Sabbatarian
contention that the Sabbath is a creation ordinance that takes precedence over all other
commandments. This has already been shown to be false in relation to Genesis 2:3 and also in
relation to Exodus 20:8-11. Instead of the Sabbath being a creation ordinance, or a method of
performance of a duty, it is a pattern set by God at creation, which has a much different purpose
and meaning than that claimed by Sabbatarians.
The reason for the establishment of the Sabbath is explained in Exodus 31:12-17 and it has
nothing to do with the seventh day of Genesis 2:3, but it has everything to do with what the
seventh day of Genesis represents in relation to God. The Sabbath was given as a sign , or
identification, between Israel and God. Israel was the only group of people who had a God who
could give them rest from spiritual works in an attempt to gain acceptance by God. They were
commanded by the real God of creation not to worship false gods contained in religious systems
that demand schemes of human works, claiming that the various commands, functions and
performances will cause a person to be approved by their god.
Just as God created the entire universe and affirmed, by His own declaration, that it was done
properly and perfectly, He was able to rest in the knowledge and accomplishment of His own
perfection and humanity is able to rest in the knowledge that God has created the means by
which all people can become personally acquainted with, and be seen as right with the real God
of the universe. Being a part of the 10 Commandments, the establishment of the Sabbath was an
element of those commands that presented humanity with God's standard of human conduct in
relation to righteousness. The standard of God made it necessary to keep the elements of the 10
Commandments PERFECTLY in order to be seen as righteous or acceptable by Him. The
impossibility of that accomplishment by any human being is evident, and the only alternative is
to appeal to the mercy of God and rest that He gives, as is the lesson to be seen in the Sabbath. If
humanity was incapable of achieving righteousness before God by means of human
accomplishment, then it was necessary for God to accomplish the task by His own sovereign
will. Just as God created a perfect universe in six days and then rested in his own glorious
accomplishment, the opposite is seen as humanity struggles for six days through human
achievement, unable to rest in its failure to achieve a right standing before God, but must appeal
to the rest that only God can grant. Rest is granted solely on the basis of the terms set by God
and by no human declarations.
The Sabbath was an object lesson in human performance; man's inability and lack of spiritual
accomplishment and worthiness against God's perfect ability and provision that is granted on His
terms. Those who keep the Sabbath, believing that it will bring about a right standing with God,
or an exalted place of spiritual standing before other people make a great mistake. The Sabbath
presents human achievement as a failure of performance, and God's ability and provision as the
triumph of accomplishment.
- Mark 2:27
In this verse, Sabbatarians claim that there is a distinction between "moral law", that of the 10
Commandments and other types of law, such as the ceremonial aspects of the Law. In other
words, they claim that the "Law" which includes the establishment of the Sabbath, expresses the
will and nature of God which is unchangeable. In addition, they point to Matthew 5:17-18, as
meaning that Christ was not and did not change or eliminate the "Law" or the 10
Commandments, therefore the establishment of the Sabbath on the seventh day is still in effect.
However, there are no Seventh-day Baptist churches who still engage in the sacrificial
observances and the Levitical priesthood functions that accompanied the observance of the
"Law". So, they are inconsistent in the manner in which they apply the Scripture, using only
those portions which they apply only to those beliefs which they hold in order to distinguish
themselves from other Christian beliefs.
The argument from Mark 2:27 is made that perhaps, at his creation in Genesis, Adam,
representing all of humanity, was created to observe the Sabbath since Jesus Christ said, "The
Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath." But there is no statement made to that
effect in the entire Scripture. The statement was made to the Pharisees in relation to the Sabbath
established in Exodus, which they and their predecessors had corrupted for their own benefit.
The Pharisees had taken what was intended for man to be a blessing and a time of rest and
refreshment, and had turned it into a hideous mass of regulations
and rules that placed man in a bondage the made the Sabbath day the most dreaded of all days.
The Pharisees had twisted the Sabbath so that it became the object and man became the subject.
God had intended the opposite, man being the object of the Sabbath, the subject of which was
rest.
In their denunciation of Jesus Christ, because He ignored the Sabbath restrictions which they had
added to the Commandments, the Pharisees
attempted to undermine the authority and credibility that Jesus Christ exerted over His actions.
Jesus Christ answered the hypocritical criticism of the Pharisees by noting that He had authority
and could exercise that authority in any manner in which He chose. In relation to the Sabbath,
He could do anything that He wished, because He was Lord of the Sabbath, not just as the person
who was in charge, but as the person who had created and established it. Since the Sabbath
existed, was established and was characterized by Jesus Christ, He could do with it as He
pleased and it was subject to His good pleasure. He could establish it, He could maintain it and
He could abolish it at will.
The comment is made by Sabbatarians that there would have been no need for Jesus Christ to
declare that He was Lord over the Sabbath if He had planned to abolish it after His death. But
this
begs the issue, because the question was not about abolishment of the Sabbath, but the claim by
the Pharisees that Jesus had violated the Sabbath by the conduct of Himself and His disciples.
The attack was on the authority of Jesus Christ, and His reply was that He had all authority to do
and act as He pleased because of His position as Lord. Since the attack came as a result of His
actions in relation to the Sabbath, He stated His credentials in relation to that institution.
Sabbatarians claim that the life and death of Jesus Christ did not change the original meaning or
the purpose of the Sabbath. In that claim, they are correct in relation to the Sabbath as it was
instituted prior to the death of Jesus Christ. But, the inference is made that nothing changed in
relation to the Sabbath after the death of Jesus Christ, and in that deduction is a great and serious
error. If Sabbatarians are consistent in what they claim, then they must make the same claim in
relation to the whole of the Mosaic Law, and therefore, since the Mosaic Law was a system of
works, then salvation is by means of works and not of grace based on the death and resurrection
of Jesus Christ. The death of Jesus Christ did change the Sabbath, because Christians
worshipped on the first day of the week and not on the seventh day of the week as they had
previously done. In spite of the claims by Sabbatarians that the early Christians and the apostle
Paul worshipped on the Sabbath, claims which are without foundation and false, the first
meeting of the apostles was on the first day of the week on which Jesus Christ appeared to
them.
Another claim made by Sabbatarians is in relation to Matthew 5:17-18, where Jesus Christ said
that He did not come to abolish the Law. Therefore Sabbatarians assume that the seventh day
Sabbath is still in effect, because Jesus Christ did not abolish the Law. In this teaching, the
Sabbatarians make a grievous error in relation to what Jesus Christ claimed and as to what His
death and resurrection signifies. Truly Jesus Christ said, I did not come to abolish the Law, but
to FULFILL..." That seven letter word signifies the relationship that Jesus Christ had to the Law
and to components of the Law that was the Sabbath. To fulfill the Law was to bring it to its
fruition, conclusion, accomplishment or finish. Something did change, in relation to the law,
after the resurrection of Jesus Christ because of the effect that He had on it, being the fulfillment
of what the Law represented. In that fulfillment, the Law, including the Sabbath, is comprehend
through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ and is quite different from that which
preceded those actions.
The death and resurrection of Jesus Christ ushered in a New Covenant, one which replaced the
Old Covenant both in kind and in nature. The apostle Paul states how complete this replacement
was because of the change of the priesthood in which Jesus Christ became the great high priest
after the order of Melchizedek, replacing the old Levitical priesthood:
For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also. For the
one concerning whom these things re spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no one has
officiated at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, a tribe with
reference to which Moses spoke nothing concerning priests. And this is clearer still, if another
priest arises according to the likeness of Melchizedek, who has become such not on the basis of
a law of physical requirement, but according to the power of an indestructible life. For it is
attested of Him, "You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek." For, on the
one hand, there is a setting aside of a former commandment because of its weakness and
uselessness (for the law made nothing perfect), and on the other hand there is a bringing in of a
better hope, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 7:12-19
When the priesthood was eliminated by the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, everything
regarding the establishment and efficacy of the old Levitical priesthood and the Law was
changed and eliminated, including the 4th commandment regarding the establishment of the
Sabbath. The reason for this change is rooted in the priesthood of Jesus Christ. He was not a
priest from the hereditary line of the Levites like all other priests of Israel had been. Jesus Christ
was from the line of Judah, from which no priests could come and from which none had ever
come. Jesus Christ was a priest after the order of Melchizedek, which was not a hereditary
priesthood, but was an appointed priesthood. Jesus Christ was appointed directly by God as a
priest, just the same as had been Melchizedek, Psalm 110:4.
The old Levitical priesthood and the Law that accompanied it were abolished, because Jesus
Christ, having fulfilled the requirements of the old Law, was a priest appointed by God and
therefore the Law of a new priesthood was set in place of the old Law and priesthood. After the
resurrection of Jesus Christ, all humanity became subject to Jesus Christ and not to the Law of
the Decalogue or the elements of the Levitical priesthood. No longer do priests minister daily in
the temple, making sacrifices for sins, but Jesus Christ is the one and only High Priest, who
intercedes in heaven for the sins of those who believe in Him. He is the great High Priest who
made the one supreme sacrifice for all, by His death on the cross and His authority is granted by
His resurrection from the dead.
It is clear from Hebrews 7:12-19 that the Law of Moses and the Levitical priesthood has been
replaced by the gospel of Jesus Christ. However, the Sabbatarian claims that the Sabbath is a
moral obligation that is above the Law of Moses. If that is the case, then it must also transcend
the gospel of Jesus Christ, because He did not teach that a person must observe the Sabbath after
His resurrection. The only appeal that the Sabbatarian has, in order to establish the claim that the
Sabbath is a perpetual and moral obligation for all humanity to observe, is to refer back to
Genesis 2:3 and claim that the Sabbath was established by God at that time. As has been shown,
that claim is based only on an ASSUMPTION and not on fact, as the term Sabbath is not used in
Genesis 2:3 and there is no teaching, doctrine or command regarding a human obligation to
observe the Sabbath in that verse.
- Luke 4:16
The use of this verse by Sabbatarians to support the idea of a perpetual and moral obligation to
honor the Sabbath is difficult to understand. The fact that Jesus Christ observed the Sabbath
while He was alive says nothing about what is being claimed by Sabbatarians.
Of course Jesus Christ observed the Sabbath. He was born under the legalistic system of the
Mosaic Law which was abolished as a result of His death. If Jesus Christ did not keep the Law,
which included the observance of the Sabbath, then He could not have fulfilled the Law.:
But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under
the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the
adoption as sons
Galatians 4:4-5 (NAS)
That was the point of His life, being able to live and adhere perfectly to the Law of God so that
He might present Himself as the perfect sacrifice, having no sin in His own life, therefore He
was able to atone for the sins of others. He could not have accomplished that task had He not
been born subject to the Law which was the standard demanded by God in order for any human
being to be considered to have right standing with Him.
The Sabbatarian can only point to this verse which speaks only of Jesus Christ fulfilling the Law,
by observing its precepts perfectly, which included observance of the Sabbath, during His
lifetime. The verse says nothing about Jesus Christ observing the Sabbath after His death and
resurrection, a concept that would be ridiculous.
- Luke 23:56
This verse, in relation to the women who prepared the spices to place on the body of Jesus Christ
after His death and their subsequent observance of the Sabbath, also has nothing to do with the
Sabbatarian claim that the Sabbath is moral and perpetual in nature. What those women did was
in relation to what they were accustomed and had been taught. They did not know or understand
what was to come, because Jesus Christ had not yet been raised from the dead and the New
Covenant had not yet been established. Why would they observe the first day when they did not
even believe that Jesus was to be resurrected?
This verse has no connection with Sabbatarian claims, and says nothing about the establishment
of a perpetual Sabbath.
- Acts 18:4
This verse is used by Sabbatarians in an effort to prove that the Apostle Paul observed the
Sabbath day and not the first day. There are Sabbatarians that claim the apostles observed the
Sabbath 84 times in the New Testament but did not honor the first day of the week.
At the very best, this argument by Sabbatarians is a grievous error, and at the worst is a complete
distortion and fabrication of the Scriptural record. In this verse, Paul is on a missionary journey,
having left Athens and arrived in Corinth. He went to the synagogue on the Sabbath, "And he
was reasoning in the synagogue every Sabbath and trying to persuade Jews and
Greeks."
Of course Paul went to the synagogue on the Sabbath, as that was the only day on which the
Jews met. If he had gone on the first day, the Lord's Day, no Jews would have been present
because they would have been engaged in their various occupations. If the apostle Paul wanted a
Jewish audience, he had to go where they gathered. They gathered in the synagogue, on the
Sabbath as they had always done.
The verse is very specific as to the purpose of the Apostle Paul. He did not go to the synagogue
to worship, but to "...persuade Jews and Greeks."
There are many other verses, in relation to the Apostle Paul visiting the synagogues while on his
missionary journeys, that are used by Sabbatarians in an attempt to "prove" that Paul observed
the Sabbath instead of the first day of the week. Their claims are absolutely without foundation
and speak nothing regarding Paul worshipping on the Sabbath, but instead reveal that he was
there as a missionary in an attempt to convert Jews and Gentiles from their traditional
beliefs.
Sadly, many Sabbatarians show not only their lack of understanding of the Scripture, but also
their contempt for the authority of Scripture by twisting and misrepresenting Scripture in an
attempt to support their own teaching instead of what is presented in the Scripture itself.
Sabbatarians place their day of worship at the top of their doctrinal list of teachings and every
other doctrine becomes secondary.
- John 14:15
In an attempt to support their belief, Sabbatarians claim that observance of the Sabbath was one
of the Commandments of Jesus Christ. There is nothing in the verse or in the verses before or
after that mention the Sabbath or even hint as to the possibility that Jesus Christ was speaking in
relation to Sabbath observance. This is a classic example of a falsehood being stated as a fact,
and then a verse being found which supports the "fact" as falsely claimed.
- Galatians 5:1
Sabbatarians teach that the Sabbath is designed as a day of freedom and,
"Jesus is in the business
of setting people free from anything that is a barrier to intimate fellowship with Him. If God
commanded us to keep the Sabbath day holy by resting, He would have to be in charge of all the
circumstances that could keep us from obeying His command. That is why God has set his Son
in charge of the Sabbath as 'Lord of the Sabbath.' Now we can be set free from all the labor and
work of the Sabbath and be able to give God our undivided attention on His day."
Seventh-day Baptist General Conference website:
www.seventhdaybptist.org
The fallacy of the application of this verse is apparent. Jesus sets the believer free from the
bondage and penalty of sin, not the tiresome duties of the work week. Additionally, if God is in
charge of the circumstances that allow a believer to worship on the seventh day, then He is
remiss in His duties, since it is impossible for many who work to have the seventh day
off.
If there is anything about the verse that could be applied to the Sabbath, it is the possibility that
it is referring to the abolishment of the day in relation to the "...yoke of slavery" which the
Sabbath had become to the Jews. Paul's teaching was in reaction to the Law and the yoke of
bondage under which a person suffered who attempted to keep those commandments. That is the
freedom that Jesus Christ gives; freedom from a legalistic system of duties, in which obedience
to those obligations does not impart a right standing with God.
The Old Testament sacrificial system was always behind in its ability to obtain atonement for
sins. As the priest went into the temple, he could only atone for the sins that had already been
committed. For those sins that were being committed as he was in the temple and those that
would be committed after he emerged from his duties, could not receive atonement for another
year. The sacrificial system was an ongoing program in which priests continually went in and out
of the temple and sacrifices were made day after day in an unrelenting repetition of those same
duties that were the content of the law. Sins were never settled and assurance that God had
accepted what was sacrificed was not entirely known. In essence, there was no assurance that
resulted in rest for the soul, because the system was one of works and duties, which pleases only
the pride of men and not God. The Sabbath was a rest that was not provided by the ingenuity and
conformity of man, but was the gift that only God could provide as a shadow or allusion to the
rest that Jesus Christ through the forgiveness of sins. Jesus Christ who forgives sins, both past,
present and future and, unlike the Old Testament sacrificial system, Jesus Christ offered a
sacrifice of Himself only once, and then the job was finished.
CONCERNS
FALSE SPIRITUALITY
The Seventh-day Baptist General Conference and the churches that are associated with it do not
hold to the position that observance of the Sabbath is necessary for salvation. They hold to an
orthodox position in regards to salvation. But they do claim that a person who is not keeping the
commandments of Jesus Christ and are not expressing true love of Jesus Christ when there is
failure to observe the seventh-day Sabbath. This is a harsh judgment to make against orthodox
Christians who, since the time of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, have loved and honored Him
as the author of their salvation.
The difficulty revolves around the claim that the Sabbath is a moral obligation and a perpetual
duty that all must follow. In that belief, they add works to their doctrinal system. They may not
use that belief in relation to salvation, but they do use it in relation to the character and integrity
of the person who claims to be a believer in Jesus Christ. If that person is not a Sabbath
observer, then they are considered to be on a lower level of commitment, devotion or
faithfulness to Jesus Christ. Sabbath worship then becomes a badge of honor or proof of a
heightened commitment, devotion or faithfulness to Jesus Christ. Sabbath observance is then the
hallmark of spirituality against which all other Christians are measured. Sabbatarians view
themselves as the spiritual, because of their obedience to what is assumed to be the command of
God and Jesus Christ, while all other Christians are considered to be carnal or less spiritual
because they do not worship on the seventh day.
"God provides all of these resources to set us free to give Him our undivided attention for
twenty-four hours a week. Of course, God wants our attention every day of the week. But
because God wants our undivided attention on the seventh day Sabbath, He sets us free from the
work of the world. God does all this for us because He loves us and He knows that we need it.
And we keep His Sabbath holy by spending time with Him because we love Him."
Seventh-day Baptist General Conference website:
www.seventhdaybptist.org
Sabbatarians claim that the Sabbath exist in order for God to have the undivided attention of
people for at least one day out of the week. This is certainly not a concept taught in Genesis 2:3,
where Sabbatarians claim that the Sabbath day was instituted. In fact, it is a teaching not found
in any Scripture, but is a teaching that is imposed by Sabbatarians themselves. They create a
doctrinal teaching that does not exist in the Scripture and then attempt to defend it by placing a
burden of guilt on people who are not Sabbatarians by inferring that a person who does not
observe the Sabbath does not truly love Jesus Christ.
So, to the Sabbatarian, a difficult dilemma is presented:
Is the Sabbatarian more spiritual, worshipping on the seventh day of the week, than the person
who worships on the first day of the week, but is being martyred for his faith on that day? Who is
the more committed, the more faithful, the more spiritual and gives God more undivided
attention?
Hebrews chapter 4 defines the Sabbath rest for the Christian, but it is not a day and it is not a duty
of observance, but it is a place, position and state of being in relation to Jesus Christ, who is the
reality of the Sabbath. It is the Sabbath rest of God, whereby the Christian can rest in the
salvation of Jesus Christ granted by God, which is the reality of the shadow of the Old Testament
Sabbath. There is a Sabbath rest, it is given freely through the grace of God and it cannot be
twisted and
corrupted by human beings
claiming that it can be found through their performance, because it is obtained only through faith,
just as all the other elements of salvation are obtained by faith in Jesus Christ. The Old Testament
Sabbath was given as a gift to Israel, as a representation of salvation from God, and was
undeserved by
them, just as the Sabbath rest of God is given to Christians through salvation, given to the believer
by the
grace of God and is also undeserved. The Old Testament Sabbath day was the shadow, while the
New
Testament Sabbath rest of Jesus Christ is the reality. There is no rest for the legalist who is always
attempting to attain a special privilege by the
presumed inherent goodness of works, but the Sabbath rest of Christ is found only by faith and
trust in Jesus Christ who is the surety of a salvation for the believer by which they are eternally
secure.
END OF ARTICLE
by Gary A. Hand
On Doctrine
|